▲ The regulators were smoked out of the “pain mask”.Figure/Chengdu Market Supervision Short Video Account number
What exactly is the odor of the regulatory staff out of the “pain mask”?
On the morning of March 21,#3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3.Many snail powder enthusiasts said that “the house collapsed and could not be accepted.” Recently, the regulators of the Chengdu market supervision department raided a takeaway platform score with a score of more than 4,000 monthly sales.It was found under the kitchen operation table and found that the stink agent and food additive fragrance were specially added to the snail powder.At present, the shop is suspended.
According to a reporter from Zhongxin Jingwei, the price of snail powder used in the stores involved in the shops involved was about 47.6 yuan per kilogram.The product details page says “You only need to add 2g of snail soup per catty”.According to the soup base of 250g of snail powder, a bag of stinky sauce can complete the “stinky” work of 500 bowls of snail powder.
In recent years, snail powder has been popular across the country. Many consumers have been conquered by their “sour and stinky” taste, and some people even have addicted.However, some merchants use the method of additive agent and stinky sauce, which will obviously worry consumers.In this regard, whether a merchant uses a stink agent is by no means a small problem, but a big problem about consumers’ right to know and food safety.
The common finished snail powder on the market does not indicate whether it uses a stink agent in the packaging label. What consumers see are that their use and addition belong to the regular food or food additives, and they will also buy it at ease.and use.In other words, the so -called stink agent, and the very good food additives, at least not an additive that is often used in snail powder.
According to the Food Safety Law, the newly listed food additives need to demonstrate their safety. If it does not meet the safety standards or does not conclude a clear conclusion, it should be carefully used or prohibited.At the same time, in the process of using food additives, limited standards must be met.If the amount is added, it will also cause harm to the consumer’s body and even become toxic and harmful foods.
In addition, according to the Consumer Rights Protection Law, consumers enjoy the right to know, and have the right to know the prices, origin, producer, use, performance, specifications, levels, main components, production dates of production.Even if a additive meets the safety standards, food producers should clearly inform consumers by packaging when they are added to food.
In other words, if it is not informed of consumers, even if the food additive is safe and add within a limited edition, it also constitutes fraud to consumers, and it should bear the corresponding compensation liability.
Specifically, as far as the snail powder powder increase agent, although the merchant claims that the product is also tested through a third -party testing agency, the quality of the product is guaranteed.But this does not mean that it can be added to the snail powder, let alone it can secretly add it from consumers.In particular, the reason why many consumers like to snail powder is that they like “natural odor”, that is, it is mainly due to the taste of sour bamboo shoots, not the “odor” without the soul that has not increased the odor.
As some netizens said, in terms of food safety, they must not be able to “technology and hard work” to add chaos at will.Under the premise that the smelly agent has not been explicitly demonstrated, it is obviously that the product can be used at will, let alone the catering operator to hide it secretly from consumers.
In the process of production and sales of snail powder, related manufacturers should also pay more attention to the protection and inheritance of traditional flavors. Do not let the odor increase in the entire snail powder industry.The regulatory authorities should increase the enforcement inspection of catering operators, and cannot allow “technology and hard work” that have not been argued to flow to the dining table.
Writing / Shi Hongju (judge)
Edit / Xu Qiuying
School pair / Li Lijun
